Derek Gee has explained the termination of his contract with Israel-Premier Tech. The Canadian, who announced his departure from the ProTeam at the end of August, cites, among other reasons, moral objections for the break. He also states that Israel-Premier Tech intends to file a damage claim against him reportedly exceeding 30 million euros.
"I would like to address and clarify some speculations about my current situation following recent public statements from my former team that my case is currently before the UCI arbitration panel," Gee begins in an extensive statement on Instagram. "I know many people expected an update, and although I cannot comment on ongoing proceedings, I feel it is very important to share my side of the story."
"I terminated my contract with just cause, as anyone has the right to do when it becomes impossible to continue working under existing circumstances. This decision was not taken lightly. It followed an irreparable breakdown in the relationship with the team director, as well as serious concerns about racing for the team, both in terms of safety and personal convictions, which weighed heavily on my conscience."
"What hurts me the most is how – once human issues come into play – money suddenly becomes the main focus; money was not the reason for ending my contract. Leaving meant I took the risk of being without a team and thus without protection if I got injured. That risk was – and still is – one I am prepared to take, simply because I could no longer continue racing for this team."
Damage Claim
Gee understands that Israel-Premier Tech sees things differently and points out that it is now up to the competent authorities to decide. Meanwhile, he is also facing other concerns. "I am now confronted with what I understand is a damage claim reportedly exceeding 30 million euros, simply because I exercised my fundamental rights as a professional and as a human being.
"These are not the kinds of amounts, nor the kinds of situations, an athlete dreams of when wanting to become a professional rider. I believe this contradicts the values that sport is supposed to represent.
Furthermore, these actions precisely reflect the issues that led to the breakdown of the relationship. It strengthens my conviction that leaving the team was the right decision, regardless of the recent announcement of changes in brand identity and superficial structural adjustments."
